On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 01:23:28PM +0200, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote: > > only a tiny handful of them had anything beyond single-word answers, and > > most of those are weak arguments that have been made and debunked many > > times already. > > right, so we have a situation where we have good reasons for moving GFDL > docs to non-free, but we've failed to communicate these reasons to our user > base. I wasn't aware that anybody had even tried. It doesn't seem particularly important. > Given the knee-jerk reactions of our users exposed by this survey, we should > probably do something thing to adress this. The reaction was exactly what everybody predicted would happen. What were you expecting from a hopelessly biased and braindamaged survey sent to -user? The questions were formulated to permit no other result. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature