On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 09:20:37AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > * MJ Ray (mjr@dsl.pipex.com) wrote: > > On 2004-05-07 07:31:27 +0100 Ean Schuessler <ean@brainfood.com> wrote: > > >With the Debian trademark we want use that is almost entirely > > >unenforced > > >except for a few particular (and somewhat poorly defined) situations. > > > > The only well-defined situation I can see at the moment is when > > someone attempts to claim debian association, backing or endorsement > > fraudulently. I believe that is covered adequately by other laws > > everywhere where we could enforce it. Is that correct? > > Uh, or they use the Debian trademark for something that's not Debian at > all.. That's not necessairly claiming it as backing or endorsement from > Debian. Well, our Open Use logo was already appropriated (years ago) by a website called "Mujahedeen News" for representing their section on Chechnya... They didn't even rename the image. The filename had "debian" in it. -- G. Branden Robinson | Ambition: an overmastering desire Debian GNU/Linux | to be vilified by enemies while branden@debian.org | living and ridiculed by friends http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | when dead. -- Ambrose Bierce
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature