[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Possible violation of the Debian trademark



On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 10:52:50PM +0200, Benj. Mako Hill wrote:
> > I think neither rendition of the site that I saw was likely to make 
> > someone think that they were buying from Debian. It would be nice to 
> > have a clearer explanation of the relationship and some more links 
> > back, though.
> I took a quick look at the site and I tend to agree with you. In
> either case, it seems worth running by our lawyer working on trademark
> issues and seeing where this goes from there.

Uh, have you _talked_ to the guy running the website yet?

Do we really prefer talking to our lawyers than our users?

Cheers,
aj

-- 
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
Don't assume I speak for anyone but myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

Protect Open Source in Australia from over-reaching changes to IP law
http://www.petitiononline.com/auftaip/ & http://www.linux.org.au/fta/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: