Re: meaning of @debian.org
On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 08:00:26PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 04:22:26PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
[regarding a suggestion that Debian could provide e-mail addresses for
developers aside from the "Debian hat" ones in debian.org]
> > You can already do this with debian.net and BSMTP.
>
> Technically, that's true and a good solution. OTOH, I wonder whether the
> different semantics of debian.org vs. debian.net are understood by most
> (or even some) people outside of the project. If people still consider
> @debian.net mails to be related with the project, the social aspect of
> this issue would not have been solved.
>
> You've made a good point though, and I wonder what others think? (Oh,
> and why is this on -private? Feel free to quote me in public, i.e. on
> -project, perhaps paraphrasing Colin's comment)
Feel free to quote my comment in full outside -private. In fact, let's
do that now: followups to -project only, please.
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
Reply to: