[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Re: Two Macedonias



On 2004-09-23 11:33:49 +0100 Vassilis Grigoriadis <nezos_debian@myrealbox.com> wrote:

I'm sorry to say so, but if Debian does not comply to the resolution of the foreign ministers of the EU than i will be in the unpleasent position to bring the subject to the EU court.

Matthew Garrett has already pointed out that this resolution does not bind debian.

If we did "comply", could Debian be charged in court elsewhere, because the constitutional name seems to be "Republic of Macedonia"? As far as I know, the Greek province Macedonia is not a republic in itself, and the Bulgarian province is officially named something else, so their consitutional name should not confuse anyone.

The alternate view is that we should follow the ISO naming, but I'm not sure if we already do or not for other states. I suspect decisions like ISO, EU and so on were originally taken while the Republic of Macedonia had other concerns, including Greece's blockade.

I suspect any EU court worth its salt would sort out EU member Slovenija's use of "Republic of Macedonia" before hearing a prosecution of a volunteer-run project, but I could be wrong. The resolution quoted dates from before Slovenija joined: I wonder if that was part of the motive for it?

Please include debian-project in your reply.

--
MJR/slef    My Opinion Only and not of any group I know
 Creative copyleft computing - http://www.ttllp.co.uk/
LinuxExpo.org.uk village 6+7 Oct http://www.affs.org.uk



Reply to: