[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Section gnustep, was: http://packages.debian.org/unstable/

>> I believe we need a new section called "gnustep", just like we have one
>> for gnome and kde.
> I think this is a good idea. Would it start by being populated with
> anything depending on gnustep*, or did I not think that through? What
> packages would that give?
Yep, this would also help me have less warnings in the gnustep-meta
packages ( http://www.linuks.mine.nu/i_debian/meta-gnustep/ ), can we
change lintian like this:

If all agree that we add 'gnustep' to the section. I think
lintian package should be updated by adding 'gnustep' to:
lintian source
testset/info_tags.non-us, line 28
checks/common_data.pm, line 21
checks/fields.desc, line 172

Gürkan "tarzeau" Sengün

Reply to: