Re: Screw non-free.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>> "JR" == Josip Rodin <email@example.com> writes:
Me> Supporting non-free and contrib also complicates all our tools
Me> and confuses people as to what "Debian" is.
JR> Neither of which is as tangible as the amount of effort
JR> necessary to switch, so you have to understand that there are
JR> people who simply disagree with your assessments.
Of course! We wouldn't be having a vote if this were self-evident.
Me> I'm just asking that you don't use Debian machines and
Me> infrastructure to do your non-Debian projects.
JR> You've used a debatable definition of "non-Debian
"non-free software isn't a part of Debian". But, yes, I was being
purposefully provocative in order to reframe the question as: non-free
is a non-Debian project that we've hosted and supported for
years. We're just revisiting whether we'll continue doing that.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----