[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: contrib



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

>>>>> "AS" == Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org> writes:

    Me> So, am I correct in saying that the fate of the "contrib"
    Me> section is unspecified in the current GR?

    AS> Yes, except that the constraint requiring it to exist is
    AS> removed. The fate of contrib is a policy matter, since it's
    AS> essentially just a question of "Which packages are allowed to
    AS> have unsatisfied dependencies?". I expect it'll stay around
    AS> for a while yet.

OK. I guessed there were a few outcomes:

    * "non-free" in the GR was shorthand for "contrib and non-free"
    * the GR doesn't specify that, but we take out contrib so we don't
      have dangling dependencies
    * we leave in contrib, with dangling dependencies
    * contrib gets in incorporated into main, with dangling
      dependencies

Was it left out on purpose, so this decision could be made later?

~ESP

- -- 
Evan Prodromou <evan@wikitravel.org>
Wikitravel - http://www.wikitravel.org/
The free, complete, up-to-date and reliable world-wide travel guide
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAVVQ4ozwefHAKBVERAuQbAKDbSOCtIK3/8gWipq3o693uHOggcgCgg3A9
9Z/+Aa6dljcdkt0RwtAPqOQ=
=G4Xi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: