On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 10:13:18AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 12:07:33PM +0100, Rob Adamson wrote:
> > Well, that is the aim. IMHO the version of Samba distributed with woody
> > is buggy to the point of being unsuitable for professional use.
> > [...]
> > woody does not work "out of the box" as a Samba server, and never will.
> This is indeed only your opinion, as I run several woody Samba servers with
> no problems.
It's roughly the opinion of the samba release maintainer too, from my
discussions with him in January, fwiw. (He cited buggy support for large
files, and a range of potentially security problems that haven't been
verified as being problems or widely announced, but have been fixed)
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``Dear Anthony Towns: [...] Congratulations --
you are now certified as a Red Hat Certified Engineer!''
Attachment:
pgp1c_H8jW1xG.pgp
Description: PGP signature