On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 10:13:18AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 12:07:33PM +0100, Rob Adamson wrote: > > Well, that is the aim. IMHO the version of Samba distributed with woody > > is buggy to the point of being unsuitable for professional use. > > [...] > > woody does not work "out of the box" as a Samba server, and never will. > This is indeed only your opinion, as I run several woody Samba servers with > no problems. It's roughly the opinion of the samba release maintainer too, from my discussions with him in January, fwiw. (He cited buggy support for large files, and a range of potentially security problems that haven't been verified as being problems or widely announced, but have been fixed) Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``Dear Anthony Towns: [...] Congratulations -- you are now certified as a Red Hat Certified Engineer!''
Description: PGP signature