Re: why Ian Jackson won't discuss the "disputes" document draft with me
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 11:30:49PM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> > Did that message not reach you, or are you just annoyed that I haven't had
> > anything particularly useful to inject into the conversation since then?
> 'useful' in this case is not the common definition, but Ian's own personal
> spin. Ie, useful in Ian's world means anything that he already agrees with.
Uh Adam, take it easy. There's no need to get all riled up over this.
Anthony Towns <email@example.com> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``If you don't do it now, you'll be one year older when you do.''