[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#158533: project: qmail is installed on murphy

>>"Raul" == Raul Miller <moth@debian.org> writes:

 Raul> [2] qmail is always redistributed at no or very-low cost and
 Raul> almost always in source form.  Source can be retained
 Raul> indefinitely, and can be redistributed indefinitely.

	Cost has little to do with free as the DFSG defines it, so
 this is a bit of a red herring.  May one distribute modified versions
 of the software? May one distribute binary copies? 

 Raul> [3] qmail is the best option available -- no one has cared enough to
 Raul> write a free replacement that provides qmail's security, performance,
 Raul> stability and features.

	You shall get arguments about that. I postfix markedly
 inferior? And the non freeness of qmail does detract from the
 suitability of using it in Debian.

 Raul> Personally, I'm considering proposing a constitutional amendment which
 Raul> provides specific exceptions to clauses 3 and 4 of the DFSG, and related
 Raul> guidelines (such as FHS) for Dan Bernstein's software.

	You have an uphil task before you to convince me of the
 desirability of this GR.

 I don't know why, but first C programs tend to look a lot worse than
 first programs in any other language (maybe except for fortran, but
 then I suspect all fortran programs look like `firsts') Olaf Kirch
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to: