Bug#158533: project: qmail is installed on murphy
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> It is also not right for us to disrupt our list services. Every time
> this argument has come up, there has been a consensus that we need to
> switch - but a refusal to do so without a viable list solution. Look
> at the graphs; the mail volume is impressive, and we still have just a
> few minutes turnaround time on all our lists. We don't want to let
> that go; the project as a whole would suffer.
And this is all done on a single celeron 400, with 512m of ram. That,
combined with the mail volume, and fast turn-around, is what is impressive.
Reply to: