[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#122859: Gnucash dependencies

Hi, I would like to see this fixed as well, but it's definately not a
bug that should be filed against the pacakge "project".

I have been running Woody for awhile.  I think Gnucash used to be in
testing but is no longer.  Maybe I still had it from my potato upgrade?

Anyway, I have it installed and working.  When I run `apt-cache show 
gnucash scm` it shows:

Package: gnucash
Status: install ok installed
Priority: extra
Section: utils
Installed-Size: 3342
Maintainer: Tyson Dowd <trd@cs.mu.oz.au>
Version: 1.3.4-3
Depends: gdk-imlib1 (>= 1.9.8-4), libart2 (>= 1.0.56-3), libaudiofile0,
libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libdb2 (>= 1:2.4.14-7), libesd0 (>= 0.2.16) |
libesd-alsa0 (>= 0.2.16), libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libgnome32 (>=
1.0.56-3), libgnomesupport0 (>= 1.0.56-3), libgnomeui32 (>= 1.0.56-3),
libgtk1.2 (>= 1.2.7-1), libgtkxmhtml1 (>= 1.0.56-3), libguile6 (>=
1:1.3.4-2), libjpeg62, libncurses5, libpng2, libreadline4 (>= 4.1),
libxpm4, libz1, xlib6g (>= 3.3.6), libwww-perl, slib, scm, guile1.3,
libguile6-slib, perl-5.005, eperl

[ gnucash description, etc... ]

Package: scm
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: interpreters
Installed-Size: 1096
Maintainer: James LewisMoss <dres@debian.org>
Version: 5d2-3
Depends: slib, libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libncurses5, libreadline4 (>= 4.1),
Description: A Scheme language interpreter.
 Scm conforms to Revised^5 Report on the Algorithmic Language Scheme and
 the IEEE P1178 specification.

Of these, the package I have that is obsolete/local according to dselect
is scm 5d2-3.

http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_excuses.html shows me that
the scm package:

* scm (- to 5d4-2)
  * Maintainer: James LewisMoss
  * 130 days old (needed 10 days)
  * out of date on alpha: scm (from 5d0-3)
  * scm (source, alpha, arm, i386, m68k, mips, mipsel,
  * powerpc, s390, sparc) is buggy! (1 > 0)
  * Not considered

-- Grant Bowman                                   <grantbow@svpal.org>

Reply to: