Re: MIA Maintainer Process Proposal

To: debian-project@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: MIA Maintainer Process Proposal
From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@valinux.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 16:08:06 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20010301160806.G7131@cistron.nl>
Mail-followup-to: debian-project@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <20010228194619.A10919@polya>; from J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk on Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 07:46:20PM +0000
References: <20010228135820.A24293@spotteddog.2y.net> <20010228194619.A10919@polya>

Previously Julian Gilbey wrote:
> Good guidelines.  One point: we must always remember to check whether
> a maintainer has filled in the "On vacation" field in the DB.
> Occasionally, developers are forced to go on extended leave (army
> callups or similar).

Some maintainer also forget to remove that data.. I've seen people
who were listed as being on vacation even though they returned 6
months earlier.

Wichert.

-- 
  _________________________________________________________________
 /       Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fool     \
| wichert@cistron.nl                  http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0  2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: MIA Maintainer Process Proposal
  - From: Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk>

Next by Date: Re: MIA Maintainer Process Proposal
Next by thread: Re: MIA Maintainer Process Proposal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread