[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#69197: inadequate backup instructions



on Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 11:06:12PM +0100, Josip Rodin (joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr) wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> There's a bug filed against the doc-debian package, including the Debian
> FAQ, about not having good backup instructions for users (admins). See
> http://bugs.debian.org/69197 for details.
> 
> Can someone please suggest an answer to such a question so I can include it
> in the FAQ? `apt-cache search backup' doesn't quite cut it :)

I've previously posted to this list a number of FAQs I've written,
including one on backups.  Per several requests, I've placed them on my
website at:

    http://www.netcom.com/~kmself/Linux/Linux.html
    http://www.netcom.com/~kmself/Linux/FAQs/backups.html

I'm wrangling with my conciense over licensing terms -- essentially I'd
like them to be compatible with existing Debian docs, freely available,
and persistantly so.  I've indicated my current direction on the
documents.

If the backup FAQ is useful, I'd be more than happy for it to be used as
part of a Debian FAQ on the subject.

-- 
Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com>     http://www.netcom.com/~kmself
 Evangelist, Zelerate, Inc.                      http://www.zelerate.org
  What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?      There is no K5 cabal
   http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/        http://www.kuro5hin.org

Attachment: pgprOiCy1GgoE.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: