Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process)

To: Dale Scheetz <dwarf@polaris.net>
Cc: nm-admin@cipsa.physik.uni-freiburg.de, debian-newmaint-discuss@lists.debian.org, debian-project@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process)
From: Matthew Vernon <matthew@sel.cam.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 09:43:49 +0100 (BST)
Message-id: <[🔎] 14727.57157.63131.840299@rapun.sel.cam.ac.uk>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.1000801143714.327t-100000@dwarf>
References: <20000801024221.D6057@ftoomsh.progsoc.uts.edu.au> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.1000801143714.327t-100000@dwarf>

 > The gain is that he presents his face to the group, in a form that we can
 > archive for "our" records, saying, "yes, we have seen this guy". This gain
 > is to the group as well as to the applicant. There is nothing to be gained
 > at this point (and much to put at risk) by presenting a false face.

But... you don't have this information for any of the current
developers, do you?

Matthew

-- 
Rapun.sel - outermost outpost of the Pick Empire
http://www.pick.ucam.org

Reply to:

References:
- Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process)
  - From: Dale Scheetz <dwarf@polaris.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process)
Next by Date: Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process)
Previous by thread: Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process)
Next by thread: Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread