Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process)
Anand Kumria wrote:
>I don't know when you asked Dale but the procedures are quite clear that
>"An image file of an appropriate piece of photo-identification" (from
><URL: http://www.debian.org/devel/join/nm-step2> is required.
Yes! We want (as a group) to see the id. The fact that a developer has
signed the key means we don't need to take any further steps to verify
that the id belongs to the applicant (in other words, we DO trust
developers to follow proper procedures when signing keys).
Why do you have such a big problem with the idea of supplying ids?
(which Debian has required at least since 1996/7 when I joined.)
--
Oliver Elphick Oliver.Elphick@lfix.co.uk
Isle of Wight http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
PGP: 1024R/32B8FAA1: 97 EA 1D 47 72 3F 28 47 6B 7E 39 CC 56 E4 C1 47
GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839 932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C
========================================
"And why call ye me, Lord, Lord, and do not the things
which I say?" Luke 6:46
Reply to: