[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fe

Previously Jim Westveer wrote:
> However, by signing an ID, or the email, I have demonstrated
> that I do infact, possess that private key.

Signing an arbitrary something proves that just as well. For example
a package, the output of fortune, etc.


 / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience  \
| wichert@wiggy.net                   http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0  2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |

Attachment: pgp_vH8bcOO6e.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: