Re: A rebuttal (was: Re: Formal CFV: General Resolution to Abolish Non-Free)
[please CC: any replies to me]
> Perhaps the GR proposed is not the most adiquate solution to do this, but
> I think if there were a second alternative on the table which did not
> alter the social contract and was less technically damaging to the project
> that it actually would have a fair chance at passing.
Moving the non-free archive parts further away from the main parts (new
directory hierarchy? new server/CNAME?), and making the package acquisition
tools verbosely advise the user about the non-freeness of the software he
tries to get/install.
Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification