Your message dated Thu, 08 May 2025 08:48:17 -0500 with message-id <5886514.DvuYhMxLoT@riemann> and subject line Re: ghostscript: BBOX slow has caused the Debian Bug report #1102270, regarding ghostscript: BBOX slow to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1102270: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1102270 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: ghostscript: BBOX slow
- From: Paul Szabo <paul.szabo@sydney.edu.au>
- Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2025 09:53:17 +1000
- Message-id: <174398359736.3417148.17300876885170533199.reportbug@enna.maths.usyd.edu.au>
Package: ghostscript Version: 10.0.0~dfsg-11+deb12u7 Severity: normal I observe that gs -sDEVICE=bbox can be pathologically slow: on the file attached as example it takes about 20 seconds. Using gs to show on screen is fine, takes under 0.5 seconds. Within my printing setup I had been using gs to count pages in PS files with something like gs -P- -dSAFER -o - -sDEVICE=bbox file.ps 2>&1 | \ grep HiResBoundingBox | wc -l Recently noticed that for some print jobs, gs took up to 10 minutes. (Seems this happens most often for PDF files sent as PS from Macs.) This is a recent issue, not sure whether triggered by some update on Mac, or of ghostscript. Noticed that ps2ps is also slow on these files, not as dramatically as BBOX. Thanks, Paul -- Paul Szabo psz@maths.usyd.edu.au www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/psz School of Mathematics and Statistics University of Sydney Australia -- System Information: Debian Release: 12.10 APT prefers stable-security APT policy: (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 6.12+pk12.63 (SMP w/64 CPU threads; PREEMPT) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages ghostscript depends on: ii libc6 2.36-9+deb12u10 ii libgs10 10.0.0~dfsg-11+deb12u7 ghostscript recommends no packages. ghostscript suggests no packages. -- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 1102270-done@bugs.debian.org, Paul Szabo <paul.szabo@sydney.edu.au>
- Subject: Re: ghostscript: BBOX slow
- From: Steven Robbins <steve@sumost.ca>
- Date: Thu, 08 May 2025 08:48:17 -0500
- Message-id: <5886514.DvuYhMxLoT@riemann>
- In-reply-to: <20e0ad76-636b-4a52-8aed-f53619b00fef@sydney.edu.au>
- References: <174398359736.3417148.17300876885170533199.reportbug@enna.maths.usyd.edu.au> <23184de4-9bd2-4ddc-b63d-29bf9312ac72@sydney.edu.au> <20e0ad76-636b-4a52-8aed-f53619b00fef@sydney.edu.au>
Hi Paul, On Monday, April 7, 2025 4:28:17 p.m. Central Daylight Saving Time Paul Szabo wrote: > All explained in the upstream bug > https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708416 > about using some lower resolution for BBOX. > (I wonder why I noticed this issue only recently, > whether the default has changed.) Thank you for reporting the bug upstream, that really helps! > Anyway please close/resolve this bug. Sorry about the noise. Thank you again for reporting back. Closing based on the upstream explanation. -Steve P.S. for future reference, you are empowered to close bugs on your own by emailing <bugnum>-done@bugs.debian.org as I am doing now.Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---