Bug#1096002: cups-daemon : apparmor errors in the logs
Package: cups-daemon
Version: 2.4.10-2+b1
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
In the logs I found these messages many times a day :
Feb 14 08:30:13 eiffel7 kernel: audit: type=1400 audit(1739518213.460:3312): apparmor="DENIED" operation="open" class="file" profile="/usr/sbin/cupsd" name="/etc/paperspecs" pid=662846 comm="cupsd" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" fsuid=0 ouid=0
Feb 14 08:30:13 eiffel7 kernel: audit: type=1400 audit(1739518213.768:3313): apparmor="DENIED" operation="capable" class="cap" profile="/usr/sbin/cupsd" pid=662846 comm="cupsd" capability=12 capname="net_admin"
It could be good to not have these messages.
Regards
-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (900, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 6.12.12-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages cups-daemon depends on:
ii adduser 3.137
ii bc 1.07.1-4
ii init-system-helpers 1.68
ii libavahi-client3 0.8-16
ii libavahi-common3 0.8-16
ii libc6 2.40-6
ii libcups2t64 2.4.10-2+b1
ii libdbus-1-3 1.16.0-1
ii libgssapi-krb5-2 1.21.3-4
ii libpam0g 1.7.0-2
ii libpaper2 2.2.5-0.3+b1
ii libsystemd0 257.2-3
ii lsb-base 11.6
ii procps 2:4.0.4-7
ii ssl-cert 1.1.3
ii sysvinit-utils [lsb-base] 3.13-1
Versions of packages cups-daemon recommends:
ii avahi-daemon 0.8-16
ii colord 1.4.7-1+b2
ii cups-browsed 1.28.17-5+b2
ii ipp-usb 0.9.23-2+b3
Versions of packages cups-daemon suggests:
ii cups 2.4.10-2+b1
ii cups-bsd 2.4.10-2+b1
ii cups-client 2.4.10-2+b1
ii cups-common 2.4.10-2
ii cups-filters 1.28.17-5+b2
pn cups-pdf <none>
ii cups-ppdc 2.4.10-2+b1
ii cups-server-common 2.4.10-2
ii foomatic-db-compressed-ppds [foomatic-db] 20230202-1
ii ghostscript 10.04.0~dfsg-2+b1
ii poppler-utils 25.01.0-4
ii smbclient 2:4.21.3+dfsg-6+b1
ii udev 257.2-3
-- no debconf information
Reply to: