Your message dated Sun, 24 Nov 2024 15:53:45 -0600 with message-id <2762010.mvXUDI8C0e@riemann> and subject line Re: ghostscript: inferior image scaling has caused the Debian Bug report #564546, regarding ghostscript: inferior image scaling to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 564546: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=564546 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: ghostscript: inferior image scaling
- From: John Lindgren <john.lindgren@tds.net>
- Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2010 23:45:30 -0500
- Message-id: <1263098730.5095.35.camel@dark-knight>
Package: ghostscript Version: 8.70~dfsg-2 Severity: wishlist A PDF file consisting of a 300 DPI page-size image, generated by printing from Open Office Draw to the CUPS PDF converter, is poorly rendered by both Evince and the GIMP, so I'm making a guess that the problem lies in Ghostscript. It seems to be downsampling images by skipping pixels rather than averaging them. I've attached snippets of the image (a) at its original 300 DPI, (b) scaled poorly to 100 DPI by Ghostscript, and (c) scaled well to 100 DPI by the GIMP. John Lindgren -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-2-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages ghostscript depends on: ii debconf [debc 1.5.28 Debian configuration management sy ii debianutils 3.2.2 Miscellaneous utilities specific t ii defoma 0.11.10-4 Debian Font Manager -- automatic f ii ghostscript [ 8.70~dfsg-2 The GPL Ghostscript PostScript/PDF ii gs-common 8.70~dfsg-2 Dummy package depending on ghostsc ii gsfonts 1:8.11+urwcyr1.0.7~pre44-4 Fonts for the Ghostscript interpre ii libc6 2.10.2-2 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libgs8 8.70~dfsg-2 The Ghostscript PostScript/PDF int Versions of packages ghostscript recommends: ii psfontmgr 0.11.10-4 PostScript font manager -- part of ghostscript suggests no packages. -- no debconf informationAttachment: 100-dpi.png
Description: PNG imageAttachment: 100-dpi-ideal.png
Description: PNG imageAttachment: 300-dpi.png
Description: PNG image
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 564546-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: ghostscript: inferior image scaling
- From: Steven Robbins <steve@sumost.ca>
- Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2024 15:53:45 -0600
- Message-id: <2762010.mvXUDI8C0e@riemann>
- In-reply-to: <4579769.8F6SAcFxjW@riemann>
> On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 23:45:30 -0500 John Lindgren <john.lindgren@tds.net> > wrote: > > Package: ghostscript > > Version: 8.70~dfsg-2 > > Severity: wishlist > > It's now 13 years on, so I have to first ask whether this issue still remains? > > > A PDF file consisting of a 300 DPI page-size image, generated by > > printing from Open Office Draw to the CUPS PDF converter, is poorly > > rendered by both Evince and the GIMP, so I'm making a guess that the > > problem lies in Ghostscript. It seems to be downsampling images by > > skipping pixels rather than averaging them. I've attached snippets of > > the image (a) at its original 300 DPI, (b) scaled poorly to 100 DPI by > > Ghostscript, and (c) scaled well to 100 DPI by the GIMP. > > If the issue does remain, can you provide a pdf file and command line that > demonstrates the problem? No response was received, so am closing this bug. -SteveAttachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---