Your message dated Mon, 08 Jan 2024 23:30:21 -0600 with message-id <4495279.Wku2Vz74k6@riemann> and subject line Re: bug resolved has caused the Debian Bug report #1022958, regarding /usr/bin/ghostscript: ghostscript conflicts with postscript-viewer when using upgrade in Sid to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1022958: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1022958 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: /usr/bin/ghostscript: ghostscript conflicts with postscript-viewer when using upgrade in Sid
- From: Nicolas Jourdan <n_jourdan@gmx.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 14:49:52 +0200
- Message-id: <166696139278.20656.9526765989617378476.reportbug@nicolas-debian>
Package: ghostscript Version: 9.56.1~dfsg-1 Severity: normal File: /usr/bin/ghostscript X-Debbugs-Cc: n_jourdan@gmx.com Dear Maintainer, When I want to upgrade the ghostscript package to the latest version Sid (to 10.0.0~dfsg-4), the package manager shows me a conflict with the postscript-viewer package. So the upgrade is cancelled by me. -- System Information: Debian Release: bookworm/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 6.0.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/12 CPU threads; PREEMPT) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages ghostscript depends on: ii libc6 2.35-4 ii libgs9 9.56.1~dfsg-1 ghostscript recommends no packages. Versions of packages ghostscript suggests: pn ghostscript-x <none> -- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 1022958-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: bug resolved
- From: Steven Robbins <steve@sumost.ca>
- Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2024 23:30:21 -0600
- Message-id: <4495279.Wku2Vz74k6@riemann>
- In-reply-to: <36c81e6f-4163-a476-c73c-55381acd1ac1@gmx.com>
On Sat, 29 Oct 2022 14:37:52 +0200 "n_jourdan@gmx.com" <n_jourdan@gmx.com> wrote: > Dear Maintainer, > The version 10.0.0~dfsg-6 of the ghostscript package seems to have removed the conflict. > So that's resolved, thank you. > > Nicolas JAttachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---