Bug#318563: marked as done (rlpr: should provide "lpr")
Your message dated Mon, 2 Oct 2023 22:43:15 +0000 (UTC)
with message-id <alpine.DEB.2.21.2310022242150.987@postfach.intern.alteholz.me>
and subject line Re: rlpr: should provide "lpr"
has caused the Debian Bug report #318563,
regarding rlpr: should provide "lpr"
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
318563: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=318563
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: rlpr: should provide "lpr"
- From: Mattia Monga <monga@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 07:22:28 +0200
- Message-id: <E1Dtf8F-0000sg-00@master.debian.org>
Package: rlpr
Version: 2.02-8.0
Severity: normal
The package should provide the "lpr" functionality, since several packages suggest or recommend it.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (800, 'unstable'), (700, 'testing'), (50, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11
Locale: LANG=it_IT@euro, LC_CTYPE=it_IT@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Versions of packages rlpr depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
rlpr recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 318563-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: rlpr: should provide "lpr"
- From: Thorsten Alteholz <debian@alteholz.de>
- Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2023 22:43:15 +0000 (UTC)
- Message-id: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2310022242150.987@postfach.intern.alteholz.me>
Package: rlpr
Version: 2.05-1
Hi Mattia,
as a previous maintainer of rlpr already wrote, it is not a good idea that rlpr Provides: lpr
So this it not a bug, but a feature :-).
Therefore I am closing this bug now.
Best regards,
Thorsten
--- End Message ---
Reply to: