[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#983263: marked as done (3.21.2 should not migrate automatically (yet))

Your message dated Thu, 04 Mar 2021 08:43:11 +0100
with message-id <1794198.C2dEWoh0u1@odyx.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#983263: 3.21.2 should not migrate automatically (yet)
has caused the Debian Bug report #983263,
regarding 3.21.2 should not migrate automatically (yet)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
983263: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=983263
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: hplip
Version: 3.21.2+dfsg0-1
Severity: serious

As hplip maintainer, I'm hereby making sure that hplip 3.21.2 doesn't migrate
automatically to bullseye. It was uploaded by mistake to unstable, but two
alternatives exist:
- A) Revert to 3.20.11, because the changes are too disruptive;
- B) Allow 3.21.2 in bullseye, because the increased hardware support is worth
     it.

Let's give the autobuilders, autopkgtest runners and Debian sid users some
time in this soft freeze, to see whether there are important regressions
tilting this balance towards A).

OdyX

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 3.21.2+dfsg1-1

Le dimanche, 21 février 2021, 19.31:14 h CET Didier 'OdyX' Raboud a écrit :
> As hplip maintainer, I'm hereby making sure that hplip 3.21.2 doesn't
> migrate automatically to bullseye. It was uploaded by mistake to unstable,
> but two alternatives exist:
> - A) Revert to 3.20.11, because the changes are too disruptive;
> - B) Allow 3.21.2 in bullseye, because the increased hardware support is
> worth it.
> 
> Let's give the autobuilders, autopkgtest runners and Debian sid users some
> time in this soft freeze, to see whether there are important regressions
> tilting this balance towards A).

As there were no regressions brought to my attention, let's get 3.21.2 in 
Bullseye; I'll address the proposed patches once it migrated.

    OdyX

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


--- End Message ---
Reply to: