[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#992784: marked as done (cups: libcupsimage2 not a dependancy)

Your message dated Tue, 24 Aug 2021 23:05:08 +0100
with message-id <24082021230236.3c143b67cc33@desktop.copernicus.org.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#992784: cups: libcupsimage2 not a dependancy
has caused the Debian Bug report #992784,
regarding cups: libcupsimage2 not a dependancy
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
992784: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=992784
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: cups
Version: 2.3.3op2-3+deb11u1
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: alainbe@free.fr

Dear Maintainer,

*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***

   * What led up to the situation?
I upgraded for Buster to Bullseye
   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
     ineffective)?
Requesting any kind of printing
   * What was the outcome of this action?
no printing
   * What outcome did you expect instead?
printing documents to my LBP113 printer


Printing completely stopped working after upgrading to Bullseye though I strictly followed the guidelines
for upgrading. The message was "filter failed" and the logs showed that Ghostscript was returning a error.
Installing libcupsimage2 solved the problem. I suggest that libscupsimage2 should be a dependancy of cups.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 11.0
  APT prefers stable-security
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 5.10.0-8-rt-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages cups depends on:
ii  cups-client            2.3.3op2-3+deb11u1
ii  cups-common            2.3.3op2-3+deb11u1
ii  cups-core-drivers      2.3.3op2-3+deb11u1
ii  cups-daemon            2.3.3op2-3+deb11u1
ii  cups-filters           1.28.7-1
ii  cups-ppdc              2.3.3op2-3+deb11u1
ii  cups-server-common     2.3.3op2-3+deb11u1
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]  1.5.77
ii  ghostscript            9.53.3~dfsg-7
ii  libavahi-client3       0.8-5
ii  libavahi-common3       0.8-5
ii  libc6                  2.31-13
ii  libcups2               2.3.3op2-3+deb11u1
ii  libgcc-s1              10.2.1-6
ii  libstdc++6             10.2.1-6
ii  libusb-1.0-0           2:1.0.24-3
ii  poppler-utils          20.09.0-3.1
ii  procps                 2:3.3.17-5

Versions of packages cups recommends:
ii  avahi-daemon  0.8-5
ii  colord        1.4.5-3

Versions of packages cups suggests:
ii  cups-bsd                                   2.3.3op2-3+deb11u1
pn  cups-pdf                                   <none>
pn  foomatic-db-compressed-ppds | foomatic-db  <none>
pn  smbclient                                  <none>
ii  udev                                       247.3-6

-- debconf information:
  cupsys/backend: lpd, socket, usb, snmp, dnssd
  cupsys/raw-print: true

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Tue 24 Aug 2021 at 22:20:51 +0200, Alain Bertrand wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> Thanks for your answer. The log is attached.
> 
> BTW :
> 
> Canon_LBP113_LBP913_USB_ could print both the test page and a page taken from the first pdf file I found,
> 
> Canon_LBP113_913_UFRII_LT could not. This is the situation that made me install libcupsimage2.
> 
> So I guess you'll close the bug for good now. Sorry for wasting your time.

Report closed at the request of the bug submitter.

-- 
Brian.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: