Hello Alexander, As ipp-usb author; do you have an opinion/advice about this? Many thanks in advance, cheers, OdyX Le samedi, 16 janvier 2021, 12.19:15 h CET Simon McVittie a écrit : > Package: ipp-usb > Version: 0.9.16-1 > Severity: minor > > A recent update to wine32:i386 on my amd64 system pulled in libsane1:i386, > which Recommends ipp-usb. Because ipp-usb is Multi-Arch: no, apt > interprets this as wanting to install ipp-usb:i386, which conflicts > with ipp-usb:amd64. > > ipp-usb seems to be a daemon (systemd service) that is contacted via > IPC, conceptually similar to avahi-daemon, dbus-daemon or cups - which > hopefully means that it doesn't matter which architecture's ipp-usb > you have, because libsane1:amd64, libsane1:i386 and libsane1:mipsel > all speak the same architecture-independent IPC protocol to communicate > with ipp-usb? > > If that's the case, then ipp-usb should be marked Multi-Arch: foreign, > which means that libsane1:i386 Recommends: ipp-usb would be satisfied > by ipp-usb:amd64.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.