[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Printing packaging rework 2020



Hello,

I'm maybe a bit late for the discussion and maybe things have already been said but here my 2¢

Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:

But the Debian packaging (task-print-server, cups, …) still installs _a lot_ 
of printer drivers and other related packages. Although in the past I was 
convinced we needed to make sure that _all_ printer drivers should be 
installed everywhere (hence the creation and usage of the printer-driver-all 
meta-package), I'm getting more and more convinced that we should reverse this 
course and install "just" what's needed to print driverless to a network 
printer in "most" cases.
Was the (very real) usecase "my mother has GNOME installed on her computer and buys a new USB printer" considered? ATM, I think, that will "just works". If the drivers are not installed by default somebody will have to install them.

PackageKit[0] can install the drivers on demand (at least GNOME will ask if there is an available driver), but AFAIK there are metadata/glue missing in debian for that to work, was that investigated?

I'm all for reducing the size of the default installation, but I'm afraid in the fact that the end-user experience might suffer.

Kind regards,

Laurent Bigonville

[0] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=882402


Reply to: