[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Processed: Re: Bug#926836: libgs9 and libgs9-common 9.27~dfsg-1 break printing: 'Printer State:' is 'Idle - Filter failed'



Processing control commands:

> reassign -1 cups-filters
Bug #926836 [libgs9 and libgs9-common] libgs9 and libgs9-common 9.27~dfsg-1 break printing: 'Printer State:' is 'Idle - Filter failed'
Bug reassigned from package 'libgs9 and libgs9-common' to 'cups-filters'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #926836 to the same values previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #926836 to the same values previously set
> forcemerge 926576 -1
Bug #926576 {Done: Didier Raboud <odyx@debian.org>} [cups-filters] cups-filters: uses undocumented code gone since ghostscript 9.27
Bug #926787 {Done: Didier Raboud <odyx@debian.org>} [cups-filters] "filter failed" in CUPS, error log says "Unable to determine number of pages"
Bug #926789 {Done: Didier Raboud <odyx@debian.org>} [cups-filters] ghostscript: unrecoverable error -> cups: no print, return "Filter failed"
Bug #926836 [cups-filters] libgs9 and libgs9-common 9.27~dfsg-1 break printing: 'Printer State:' is 'Idle - Filter failed'
Severity set to 'important' from 'normal'
Marked Bug as done
Added indication that 926836 affects ghostscript
Marked as fixed in versions cups-filters/1.22.5-1 and cups-filters/1.21.6-5.
Bug #926787 {Done: Didier Raboud <odyx@debian.org>} [cups-filters] "filter failed" in CUPS, error log says "Unable to determine number of pages"
Bug #926789 {Done: Didier Raboud <odyx@debian.org>} [cups-filters] ghostscript: unrecoverable error -> cups: no print, return "Filter failed"
Merged 926576 926787 926789 926836

-- 
926576: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=926576
926787: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=926787
926789: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=926789
926836: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=926836
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems


Reply to: