Bug#926787: ghostscript: "filter failed"

To: 926787@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#926787: ghostscript: "filter failed"
From: James Van Zandt <jim.vanzandt@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 21:13:39 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] CABwAVW+ip41GKnqECWYFbie38K5O5kuPrOze8saoPEyMZGUFqQ@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: James Van Zandt <jim.vanzandt@gmail.com>, 926787@bugs.debian.org
References: <[🔎] CABwAVWKre-9Rf5hRCkf0c_EZd6Yz_4B3iLtfKbxUkmtz8Enp3A@mail.gmail.com>

Yes, this is the same as #926576. You may merge them.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#926787: ghostscript: "filter failed"
  - From: Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk>

References:
- Bug#926787: "filter failed" in CUPS, error log says "Unable to determine number of pages"
  - From: James Van Zandt <jim.vanzandt@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Processed (with 1 error): Re: Bug#926707: cups: please do not generate files under /etc but use /var/lib for that (etckeeper woes)
Next by Date: Bug#926789: ghostscript: unrecoverable error -> cups: no print, return "Filter failed"
Previous by thread: Bug#926787: "filter failed" in CUPS, error log says "Unable to determine number of pages"
Next by thread: Bug#926787: ghostscript: "filter failed"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread