Bug#927429: Is ghostscript/9.27~dfsg-2 not going to testing?

To: Hideki Yamane <henrich@iijmio-mail.jp>, printing@lists.debian.org
Cc: debian-release@lists.debian.org, 927429@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#927429: Is ghostscript/9.27~dfsg-2 not going to testing?
From: Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 09:00:38 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 155859483882.8327.17290468255722756552@auryn.jones.dk>
Reply-to: Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk>, 927429@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20190523101801.be21895adfe1b225555e6e7c@iijmio-mail.jp>
References: <[🔎] 20190523101801.be21895adfe1b225555e6e7c@iijmio-mail.jp> <20190419141523.AF3F9492026A@mail.topstudio.co.jp>

Hi Hideki-san,

[adding bugreport as recipient]

Quoting Hideki Yamane (2019-05-23 03:18:01)
> Hi again,
> 
>  Is ghostscript/9.27~dfsg-2 not going to testing?
>  https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=927429
> 
>  It seems that it should be in there.

Yes, agreed.

I am lousy at dealing with release team.  Help much appreciated.


 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: signature

Reply to:

References:
- Is ghostscript/9.27~dfsg-2 not going to testing?
  - From: Hideki Yamane <henrich@iijmio-mail.jp>

Prev by Date: Is ghostscript/9.27~dfsg-2 not going to testing?
Previous by thread: Is ghostscript/9.27~dfsg-2 not going to testing?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread