[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#905734: found #905734 hplip/3.17.10



But upon request, packages can be adapted to target specific suites; that's
precisely what *-backports suites are.  That's why I uploaded a _modified_
hplip 3.18.10+dfsg0-3 to the `stretch-backports` suite.  That upload was
accepted today and is in the process of being built for all architectures.

https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=hplip&suite=stretch-backports

Stretch users will be able to get the latest hplip by using the `stretch-
backports` suite additionally to their standard APT setup.

I just downloaded it. It won't build under stretch. All the builds shown in the logs are under sid or experimental.

Correct me if I am wrong, but if you build under sid, it won't run under stretch, because the libraries
linked against won't be the same.

I don't think it will help stretch users.

Thank you for reading this email.

On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 1:23 PM Didier 'OdyX' Raboud <odyx@debian.org> wrote:
Le jeudi, 6 décembre 2018, 19.03:57 h CET Paul Elliott a écrit :
> You guys must be developing under sid, and never checking that your
> releases will actually build under the various stable releases.

Exactly.  And it allows removing _a lot_ of unneeded complexity.  As hplip
packager, I provide new upstream releases tailored towards the _next_ stable
release.  The "staging" area for this is `unstable`.  It will then migrate to
`testing` (aka `buster`).

Backporting these new upstream releases is a _different_ and _additional_
work.  There's absolutely zero requirement for packages uploaded to `unstable`
to build without modifications on other releases.

> But your branches are still named for the various stable versions,
> that is, debian/stretch-backports, debian/stretch, debian/jessie-backports,
> debian/jessie.

Yes. These build on the corresponding target suites.  They don't necessarily
integrate the latest upstream releases (nor should they).

> But you never check that these commits will actually build for these
> versions.

No, we don't.  Doing so would be _a lot_ of unneeded work.

But upon request, packages can be adapted to target specific suites; that's
precisely what *-backports suites are.  That's why I uploaded a _modified_
hplip 3.18.10+dfsg0-3 to the `stretch-backports` suite.  That upload was
accepted today and is in the process of being built for all architectures.

https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=hplip&suite=stretch-backports

Stretch users will be able to get the latest hplip by using the `stretch-
backports` suite additionally to their standard APT setup.

Cheers,
    OdyX

Reply to: