[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#912768: hplip-data: hp-toolbox fsck



On Mon 05 Nov 2018 at 21:41:58 +0100, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:

> On Mon, 5 Nov 2018, Brian Potkin wrote:
> > On Sun 04 Nov 2018 at 23:21:14 +0000, Brian Potkin wrote:
> > 
> > > avahi-deamon is essential; there were no instructions to uninstall it.
> > > Without it you will be unable to detect the DNS-SD broadcasts of the
> > > printer/scanner device. Put it back.
> > 
> > Please forget about this, it is nonsense.
> 
> Right.  I'll say that much.  I don't intend to follow the avahi track.
> 
> I just wish the bugs are fixed in 3.18.10+dfsg0-1, specially when 
> patches are readily available.  Just like other distributions (ubuntu, 
> mint, arch, fedora, and so on do already) do.  So, please patch.  The 
> little I digged in upstream bug DB, reported bugs (those that concern 
> me) seem to be buried, although solutions exist :(
> 
> 3.17.10+repack0-5 (in testing) is working for me as expected (with a 
> minimally patched models.dat). The downgraded to 3.17.10+repack0-5 in 
> unstable (with the same patch) is also usable, but not working as 
> well.  I see this kind of messages in the syslog (in unstable):
> 
> hp-toolbox(UI)[1127]: warning: Supplies information not available for this device.
> /hpfax: [1292]: error: Failed to create/var/spool/cups/tmp/.hplip
> xpraforwarder: '/usr/lib/cups/backend/xpraforwarder'
> python3: io/hpmud/hpmud.c 246: invalid channel_open state, current io_mode=raw/uni service=HP-MESSAGE hp:/net/HP_ColorLaserJet_MFP_M278-M281?ip=192.168.x.y
> hpcups[3963]: prnt/hpcups/Hbpl1.cpp 52: Hbpl1 constructor : m_szLanguage = HBPL1
> hp[7978]: prnt/backend/hp.c 919: ERROR: null print job total=0
> 
> and others.
> 
> The hplip* packages are highly rated in popcon (~40%).  So, that shows 
> the importance of stabilizing the hplip* packages.

It would be useful to have what happens with

 scanimage -d "hpaio:/net/HP_ColorLaserJet_MFP_M278-M281?ip=192.168.x.y" > out.pnm

for 3.18.10+dfsg0-1.

Does the scanner work? Do you get out.pnm?

Cheers,

Brian.


Reply to: