Dear all, On 31-08-18 15:48, Till Kamppeter wrote: > On 31/08/18 15:36, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: >> Le vendredi, 31 août 2018, 01.25:24 h CEST Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >>> Do the freshly released experimental Ghostscript release help anything? >> >> It doesn't seem to, unfortunately. :-( >> >> To reproduce the issue; just run this as root: >> /usr/share/cups/test-drivers I tried this on my fully up-to-date testing/buster system and it fails for a different reason: lpinfo: Bad file descriptor Not sure yet, what that means for any of this. >> Surprisingly; it will fail when testing the _second_ printer, always. >> Also, it >> doesn't seem to get fixed with the ghostscript from testing. >> >> There's something fishy here, but I can't say with certainty that it's >> ghostscript's fault :-( > > Which driver is this second printer using? As mentioned in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=907493#26 DUMMY_PRINTER_NAME=test-printer0 driver=drv:///sample.drv/dymo.ppd > Which version of cups-filters are you using? 1.21.0 has a bug in > foomatic-rip which is fixed in 1.21.1. Please update to 1.21.1 if you > have 1.21.0 currently. I had none installed. I now try with 1.20.4-1 which is in testing, where the bug was reported from and where cups fails with the ghostscript from unstable. The autopkgtest ran successfully with cups-filters/1.21.0-1 and with cups-filters/1.21.1-1 so I assume they are both fine in this respect. On my laptop, lpinfo still fails. Paul
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature