[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#909076: ghostscript: ps2ascii crashes: Error: /typecheck in --.bind--



Hi,

Am 28.09.18 um 00:16 schrieb Salvatore Bonaccorso:
> Hi Markus,
> 
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 10:33:06PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
[...]
>> The text is correctly displayed now in Jessie but the Stretch version
>> shows Chinese characters instead. Hence I would appreciate it if you
>> could double-check and verify the output on your terminals.
> 
> The commit might be part indeed of the solution, that is to switch to
> the txtwrite device. In the bisect I did, I already used as well a
> variant with using the txtwrite device. This is what lead to
> previously posted git bisect log (with commits between a broken one in
> the 9.20 series, up to the a less broken one[*], and in each iteration
> always applying as strategy the mentioned commit for fixing the CVE
> and which caused the regression, and calling gs directly with the
> needed parameter using the txtwrite device).
> 
> I know already that e.g. using the commit
> http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=commit;h=cc746214644deacd5233a1453ce660573af09443
> (*and* using the txtwrite device) seems to improve the situation. But
> there are still dispalying discrepancies and regressions with test
> files. So this is not enough for the stretch built at least :-/.
> In the jessie patched version, you did exact the same documents with
> old version and with patched one for e.g. alpahet.ps and waterfall.ps?

Could you post your test files somewhere and describe what you expect to
see? I would like to test them too. In Jessie it is sufficient to just
switch to the txtwrite device. If I apply the other Git commit
cc746214644deacd5233a1453ce660573af09443 then I even get the same
results in Stretch.

It is not surprising that both versions behave differently. The version
in Jessie is ancient and from 2012. A lot of bugs could have been
introduced and fixed between 2012 and today.




Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: