[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#860869: ghostscript: diff for NMU version 9.22~dfsg-2.1



Control: tags 860869 + patch
Control: tags 860869 + pending
Control: tags 896069 + pending

Dear maintainer,

I've prepared an NMU for ghostscript (versioned as 9.22~dfsg-2.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.

Regards,
Salvatore
diff -Nru ghostscript-9.22~dfsg/debian/changelog ghostscript-9.22~dfsg/debian/changelog
--- ghostscript-9.22~dfsg/debian/changelog	2018-02-10 17:41:31.000000000 +0100
+++ ghostscript-9.22~dfsg/debian/changelog	2018-04-20 12:28:29.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+ghostscript (9.22~dfsg-2.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Buffer overflow in fill_threshold_buffer (CVE-2016-10317)
+    (Closes: #860869)
+  * pdfwrite - Guard against trying to output an infinite number
+    (CVE-2018-10194) (Closes: #896069)
+
+ -- Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>  Fri, 20 Apr 2018 12:28:29 +0200
+
 ghostscript (9.22~dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Update Vcs-* fields for the move to salsa.d.o
diff -Nru ghostscript-9.22~dfsg/debian/patches/0001-Fix-bug-697459-Buffer-overflow-in-fill_threshold_buf.patch ghostscript-9.22~dfsg/debian/patches/0001-Fix-bug-697459-Buffer-overflow-in-fill_threshold_buf.patch
--- ghostscript-9.22~dfsg/debian/patches/0001-Fix-bug-697459-Buffer-overflow-in-fill_threshold_buf.patch	1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
+++ ghostscript-9.22~dfsg/debian/patches/0001-Fix-bug-697459-Buffer-overflow-in-fill_threshold_buf.patch	2018-04-20 12:28:29.000000000 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+From: Ray Johnston <ray.johnston@artifex.com>
+Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 12:48:54 -0800
+Subject: Fix bug 697459 Buffer overflow in fill_threshold_buffer
+Origin: http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;h=362ec9daadb9992b0def3520cd1dc6fa52edd1c4
+Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/860869
+Bug: https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697459
+Bug-Debian-Security: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2016-10317
+
+There was an overflow check for ht_buffer size, but none for the larger
+threshold_buffer. Note that this file didn't fail on Windows because the
+combination of the ht_buffer and the size of the (miscalculated due to
+overflow) threshold_buffer would have exceeded the 2Gb limit.
+---
+ base/gxht_thresh.c | 13 ++++++++++---
+ base/gxipixel.c    |  2 +-
+ 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/base/gxht_thresh.c b/base/gxht_thresh.c
+index 3fb840213..726861685 100644
+--- a/base/gxht_thresh.c
++++ b/base/gxht_thresh.c
+@@ -711,7 +711,9 @@ gxht_thresh_image_init(gx_image_enum *penum)
+            space */
+         max_height = (int) ceil(fixed2float(any_abs(penum->dst_height)) /
+                                             (float) penum->Height);
+-        if ((max_height > 0) && (penum->ht_stride * spp_out > max_int / max_height))
++        if (max_height <= 0)
++            return -1;		/* shouldn't happen, but check so we don't div by zero */
++        if (penum->ht_stride * spp_out > max_int / max_height)
+             return -1;         /* overflow */
+ 
+         penum->ht_buffer =
+@@ -734,6 +736,11 @@ gxht_thresh_image_init(gx_image_enum *penum)
+            Also allow a 15 sample over run during the execution.  */
+         temp = (int) ceil((float) ((dev_width + 15.0) + 15.0)/16.0);
+         penum->line_size = bitmap_raster(temp * 16 * 8);  /* The stride */
++        if (penum->line_size > max_int / max_height) {
++            gs_free_object(penum->memory, penum->ht_buffer, "gxht_thresh");
++            penum->ht_buffer = NULL;
++            return -1;         /* thresh_buffer size overflow */
++        }
+         penum->line = gs_alloc_bytes(penum->memory, penum->line_size * spp_out,
+                                      "gxht_thresh");
+         penum->thresh_buffer = gs_alloc_bytes(penum->memory,
+@@ -754,7 +761,7 @@ gxht_thresh_image_init(gx_image_enum *penum)
+ }
+ 
+ static void
+-fill_threshhold_buffer(byte *dest_strip, byte *src_strip, int src_width,
++fill_threshold_buffer(byte *dest_strip, byte *src_strip, int src_width,
+                        int left_offset, int left_width, int num_tiles,
+                        int right_width)
+ {
+@@ -908,7 +915,7 @@ gxht_thresh_planes(gx_image_enum *penum, fixed xrun,
+                        to update with stride */
+                     position = contone_stride * k;
+                     /* Tile into the 128 bit aligned threshold strip */
+-                    fill_threshhold_buffer(&(thresh_align[position]),
++                    fill_threshold_buffer(&(thresh_align[position]),
+                                            thresh_tile, thresh_width, dx, left_width,
+                                            num_full_tiles, right_tile_width);
+                 }
+diff --git a/base/gxipixel.c b/base/gxipixel.c
+index edd40c52d..cb4f02a09 100644
+--- a/base/gxipixel.c
++++ b/base/gxipixel.c
+@@ -758,7 +758,7 @@ gx_image_enum_begin(gx_device * dev, const gs_gstate * pgs,
+     penum->memory = mem;
+     penum->buffer = buffer;
+     penum->buffer_size = bsize;
+-    penum->line = 0;
++    penum->line = NULL;
+     penum->icc_link = NULL;
+     penum->color_cache = NULL;
+     penum->ht_buffer = NULL;
+-- 
+2.17.0
+
diff -Nru ghostscript-9.22~dfsg/debian/patches/0002-pdfwrite-Guard-against-trying-to-output-an-infinite-.patch ghostscript-9.22~dfsg/debian/patches/0002-pdfwrite-Guard-against-trying-to-output-an-infinite-.patch
--- ghostscript-9.22~dfsg/debian/patches/0002-pdfwrite-Guard-against-trying-to-output-an-infinite-.patch	1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
+++ ghostscript-9.22~dfsg/debian/patches/0002-pdfwrite-Guard-against-trying-to-output-an-infinite-.patch	2018-04-20 12:28:29.000000000 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+From: Ken Sharp <ken.sharp@artifex.com>
+Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 15:46:32 +0100
+Subject: pdfwrite - Guard against trying to output an infinite number
+Origin: http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=commit;h=39b1e54b2968620723bf32e96764c88797714879
+Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/896069
+Bug: https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699255
+Bug-Debian-Security: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2018-10194
+
+Bug #699255 " Buffer overflow on pprintg1 due to mishandle postscript file data to pdf"
+
+The file uses an enormous parameter to xyxhow, causing an overflow in
+the calculation of text positioning (value > 1e39).
+
+Since this is basically a nonsense value, and PostScript only supports
+real values up to 1e38, this patch follows the same approach as for
+a degenerate CTM, and treats it as 0.
+
+Adobe Acrobat Distiller throws a limitcheck error, so we could do that
+instead if this approach proves to be a problem.
+---
+ devices/vector/gdevpdts.c | 7 ++++++-
+ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+diff --git a/devices/vector/gdevpdts.c b/devices/vector/gdevpdts.c
+index 848ad781f..172fe6bc3 100644
+--- a/devices/vector/gdevpdts.c
++++ b/devices/vector/gdevpdts.c
+@@ -103,9 +103,14 @@ append_text_move(pdf_text_state_t *pts, double dw)
+ static int
+ set_text_distance(gs_point *pdist, double dx, double dy, const gs_matrix *pmat)
+ {
+-    int code = gs_distance_transform_inverse(dx, dy, pmat, pdist);
++    int code;
+     double rounded;
+ 
++    if (dx > 1e38 || dy > 1e38)
++        code = gs_error_undefinedresult;
++    else
++        code = gs_distance_transform_inverse(dx, dy, pmat, pdist);
++
+     if (code == gs_error_undefinedresult) {
+         /* The CTM is degenerate.
+            Can't know the distance in user space.
+-- 
+2.17.0
+
diff -Nru ghostscript-9.22~dfsg/debian/patches/series ghostscript-9.22~dfsg/debian/patches/series
--- ghostscript-9.22~dfsg/debian/patches/series	2018-02-10 17:40:08.000000000 +0100
+++ ghostscript-9.22~dfsg/debian/patches/series	2018-04-20 12:28:29.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+0001-Fix-bug-697459-Buffer-overflow-in-fill_threshold_buf.patch
+0002-pdfwrite-Guard-against-trying-to-output-an-infinite-.patch
 2001_docdir_fix_for_debian.patch
 2002_gs_man_fix_debian.patch
 2003_support_multiarch.patch

Reply to: