Bug#813094: Split braille support into a separate package

[Didier 'OdyX' Raboud <odyx@debian.org>]

Le lundi, 1 février 2016, 12.00:53 Yuri D'Elia a écrit :
> On 01/02/16 11:58, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >> The double recommend/suggests is a bit wonky.
> >> Maybe you should recommend on (liblouis-bin | liblouisutdml-bin).
> >> 
> >> I don't know what's the difference in braille support between
> >> liblouis-bin and liblouisutdml-bin, but if the package is
> >> recommended I would go for the better one only.
> > 
> > The better one is liblouisutdml-bin, which provides better document
> > parsing than the basic liblouis-bin.
> > 
> > The issue is that ubuntu does not have liblouisutdml-bin in main,
> > only in universe.
> 
> Ah, I see now.
> Then I would simply recommend on (liblouisutdml-bin | liblouis-bin).

Till, Samuel; does this look like a good-enough compromise ?

--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -76,12 +76,11 @@ Depends: ${shlibs:Depends},
  bc,
  ghostscript (>= 9.02~),
  liblouis-data,
- liblouis-bin,
  imagemagick (>= 6.4~),
  poppler-utils
-Recommends: colord
+Recommends: colord,
+ liblouisutdml-bin | liblouis-bin,
 Suggests: foomatic-db-compressed-ppds | foomatic-db,
- liblouisutdml-bin,
  antiword,
  docx2txt
 Conflicts: ghostscript-cups,


-- 
Cheers,
    OdyX