[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#795404: cups-backend-bjnp: stops printing after some lines



On Fri 14 Aug 2015 at 18:45:48 +0200, Björn Siebke wrote:

> Using lp doesn't make any difference, but I now understood the problem
> better. Because actually printing never worked: When I "successfully"
> tested for the first time I only used one line of text. Now I see the
> problem is that you can print one line and even some more, but after
> approximately one third of the page the printer stops and the error is
> displayed. This is independent of lp or LibreOffice.

We can test if this behaviour is independent of CUPS and the filtering
system too,

  DEVICE_URI=bjnp://db-printer.fritz.box:8611 /usr/lib/cups/backend/bjnp 1 1 1 1 1 /etc/services

should churn out a few pages. It's a quick and dirty method but might
indicate whether the printer can progress beyond printing a third of a
page. The output will probably be gibberish so I'd have only 3 or 4
sheets of paper in the printer.

> Of course I switched the printer on and off - that didn't change
> anything. I don't know what you mean by switching off
> db-printer.fritz.box. This is just the network adress of the printer.

My misconception. I was mislead by "fritz.box" in the name.

> The setup is:
> Printer -(WiFi)- Router -(WiFi)- Laptop

This clears up my misconception.
 
> What do you mean by that? Ping the router? Ping cups (which is on my
> laptop)?

Ping the printer is what I meant.

> I once saw that http://localhost:631/ was unreachable for some time
> after the error, but I can't reproduce that now. Maybe it's an issue
> with cups?!
> 
> Also I saw that when switching on the printer there is a message
> "backend failed" in the status of the preferences dialogue. When I
> activate the printer this message vanishes. But I can't remember this
> behaviour from earlier tries.

The operation panel on some printers allows printing a few sheets of
diagnostic information. If yours does, give it a try.

Regards,

Brian.


Reply to: