[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#729357: marked as done (cups: Does not print remotely.)

Your message dated Sat, 11 Jul 2015 13:48:18 +0100
with message-id <11072015134722.81ceea075f79@desktop.copernicus.demon.co.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#729357: cups: Does not print remotely.
has caused the Debian Bug report #729357,
regarding cups: Does not print remotely.
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
729357: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=729357
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: cups
Version: 1.6.3-1
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

I believe it happened after some packages upgrade.

I ca not print remotely any more.

When i give a remote task, i see on the printer web page of the host to which printer is connected the job is in the lkist of jobs and is marked w/ a tine as done, wneh it is not in fact.

Logs have nothing interesting : no errors. Only page.log is not addded except i print through lp program.

Please fix it. Thank you for your work for Debian!


-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (700, 'testing'), (600, 'stable'), (500, 'testing-updates'), (500, 'stable-updates')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.10-3-686-pae (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages cups depends on:
ii  cups-client            1.6.3-1
ii  cups-common            1.6.3-1
ii  cups-daemon            1.6.3-1
ii  cups-filters           1.0.34-3+b1
ii  cups-ppdc              1.6.3-1
ii  cups-server-common     1.6.3-1
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]  1.5.51
ii  ghostscript            9.05~dfsg-8
ii  libavahi-client3       0.6.31-2
ii  libavahi-common3       0.6.31-2
ii  libc-bin               2.17-93
ii  libc6                  2.17-93
ii  libcups2               1.6.3-1
ii  libcupscgi1            1.6.3-1
ii  libcupsimage2          1.6.3-1
ii  libcupsmime1           1.6.3-1
ii  libcupsppdc1           1.6.3-1
ii  libgcc1                1:4.8.2-1
ii  libstdc++6             4.8.2-1
ii  libusb-1.0-0           2:1.0.17-1+b1
ii  lsb-base               4.1+Debian12
ii  poppler-utils          0.18.4-8
ii  procps                 1:3.3.4-2

Versions of packages cups recommends:
ii  avahi-daemon               0.6.31-2
ii  colord                     1.0.2-1
ii  foomatic-filters           4.0.17-1
ii  ghostscript-cups           9.05~dfsg-8
ii  printer-driver-gutenprint  5.2.9-1

Versions of packages cups suggests:
pn  cups-bsd                                   <none>
pn  cups-pdf                                   <none>
pn  foomatic-db-compressed-ppds | foomatic-db  <none>
pn  hplip                                      <none>
ii  printer-driver-hpcups                      3.13.9-2
ii  smbclient                                  2:4.0.10+dfsg-4
ii  udev                                       204-5

-- debconf-show failed

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Dear Debian User,

Further information on your issue was requested some time ago but there
has been no response from you. Use of our limited, volunteer supported
resources is best served by not keeping open inactive bugs any longer
than desirable, especially when the package concerned is older than the
current stable Debian version. Consequently, the report is now being
closed.

You may, of course, wish to review the reported problem. It would be
appreciated if any future investigation could be conducted using the
testing or unstable distributions. If considered necessary, this report
could be re-opened or a new bug report, possibly referencing this one,
submitted. 

Thank you for your report.

Regards,

Brian.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: