[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#793223: marked as done (brlaser: change of type in system_error might break with GCC-5)

Your message dated Fri, 04 Sep 2015 10:10:27 +0200
with message-id <4288073.ccDxICzbUG@odyx.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#793223: brlaser: change of type in system_error might break with GCC-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #793223,
regarding brlaser: change of type in system_error might break with GCC-5
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
793223: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=793223
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: src:brlaser
Severity: important
Tags: sid stretch
User: debian-gcc@lists.debian.org
Usertags: gcc-pr66145

GCC PR libstdc++/66145 is a regression in GCC 5 which won't be fixed
upstream in time for the GCC defaults change.  The work around is to
rebuild the affected packages after GCC 5 is the default compiler.
Please look at the code and decide, if the package is affected. If
not, please just close the issue.  If it's a real issue, I'll add
the packages affected to libstdc++6's Breaks attributes, with the
version of the package at the time of the defaults change.

See https://wiki.debian.org/GCC5#libstdc.2B-.2B-_c.2B-.2B-11_incompatibilities_.284.9_and_5.29
for further information.

To build with GCC 5,install the gcc, g++, gfortran, ... packages
from experimental (apt-get -t experimental install g++).

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi Matthias, and thanks for the bugreport,

Le mercredi, 22 juillet 2015, 13.33:11 Matthias Klose a écrit :
> GCC PR libstdc++/66145 is a regression in GCC 5 which won't be fixed
> upstream in time for the GCC defaults change.  The work around is to
> rebuild the affected packages after GCC 5 is the default compiler.
> Please look at the code and decide, if the package is affected. If
> not, please just close the issue.  If it's a real issue, I'll add
> the packages affected to libstdc++6's Breaks attributes, with the
> version of the package at the time of the defaults change.

(I must say that my understanding of these issues is probably not 
sufficient, but I'll try anyway).

Considering that the culprit code is only seen in brlaser's test-suite 
(in lest.hpp, as far as I could see), and is not shipped in the binary 
package, I'm hereby closing this issue.

Please, by all means, reopen this if my analysis is wrong.

Cheers,
OdyX

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


--- End Message ---
Reply to: