[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#749384: marked as done (gutenprint: No Epson Stylus Photo R220 or R200 drivers)

Your message dated Wed, 28 May 2014 18:18:03 +0200
with message-id <1451839.WKY0ZhLjmE@gyllingar>
and subject line Re: Bug#749384: gutenprint: No Epson Stylus Photo R220 or R200 drivers
has caused the Debian Bug report #749384,
regarding gutenprint: No Epson Stylus Photo R220 or R200 drivers
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
749384: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=749384
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Package: printer-driver-gutenprint
Version: 5.2.10~pre2-2

The gutenprint website says that they still support these two models, but the package only ships drivers for the R240 and up. Is this a regression, or purposeful?

Thank you,
--
Cameron Norman

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 5.2.10-1

Le mardi, 27 mai 2014, 12.14:42 Didier 'OdyX' Raboud a écrit :
> Le lundi, 26 mai 2014, 17.18:27 Cameron Norman a écrit :
> > Package: printer-driver-gutenprint
> > Version: 5.2.10~pre2-2
> > 
> > The gutenprint website says that they still support these two
> > models, but the package only ships drivers for the R240 and up. Is
> > this a regression, or purposeful?
> 
> I think you're now only seeing the printer-driver-escpr driver
> entries: gutenprint 5.2.10~pre* versions failed to propose any
> available driver:
> 
> 	/usr/lib/cups/driver/gutenprint.5.2 list
> 
> ^ That should give a list of more than 2000 printer entries.
> 
> I have a fix pending that I'll upload with the final version of
> 5.2.10.

This should be fixed with the 5.2.10-1 version I just uploaded to 
unstable, please re-open if that's not the case.

Cheers,
OdyX

--- End Message ---
Reply to: