[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#742668: cups and systemd - old troubles



Le lundi, 31 mars 2014, 09.08:53 Wojciech Margas a écrit :
> Dear Maintainer,
> 
> During updating Jessie (amd64) I have the same problem:
> 
> Errors were encountered while processing:
>   cups-daemon
>   cups-core-drivers
>   cups
>   printer-driver-gutenprint
> E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

This should be fixed by the coming cups 1.7.1-11, which should land in 
sid today and in jessie in 5 days. Please test it at your earlier 
convenience (installing it on jessie should "Just Work"™.

> A quick googling show, that most of big distros (Fedora, SuSE, Arch,
> Ubuntu...) had problems with cups/systemd interplay at least since
> 2012.

Yet none of these went as far as Debian for what systemd socket 
integration is concerned. 

> Comming back to Jessie:
> 
> 1. /etc/systemd/system/ folder shows
> 
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root    9 Mar 28 21:20 cups.path -> /dev/null
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root    9 Mar 28 21:20 cups.service -> /dev/null
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root    9 Mar 28 21:20 cups.socket -> /dev/null
> 
> Is it normal, that all three files: cups.path, cups.service and
> cups.socket are pointing to /dev/null?

Version rollbacks are not supported by Debian, but that's weird. It's 
most certainly a bug of dh-systemd though.

> This is cups version 1.7.1-10.
> With version 1.7.1-7 (after downgrading) cups was still working, and
> with version from wheezy (apart from breaking dependencies with
> jessie) I have managed to print few documents. However, cups version
> 1.7.1-7 is already removed from
> ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/c/cups/
> so I get stuck with broken 1.7.1-10.
> 
> Would you mind to temporary bring back previous version (1.7.1-7) to
> ftp repositories (for my manual downgrade) before you will fix the
> official jessie version?

1.7.1-7 is still available from snapshots:

http://snapshot.debian.org/package/cups/1.7.1-7/

To be clear: Jessie will have a version bigger than 1.7.1-7 very soon 
and I absolutely don't intend to roll the content of the package back to 
it's -7 status, but rather fix the remaining bugs.

Cheers,
OdyX


Reply to: