Bug#496070: [ghostscript] opentypefont
Am Mittwoch, den 28.08.2013, 17:27 +0200 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
> Yes, I am aware of that. I thought we were in consensus about that.
>
> The list I provided in my last email was meant as a starting point for
> eventual exploration of *other* uses than for RIPs. I.e. as a response
> to the question about visual comparison.
Alright, that wasn't clear to me.
> There are several common practices. Most (if not all) content of
> poppler-data package has Adobe as true source (and is included with
> Ghostscript project too, just stripped from recent Debian packaging).
I'll ask upstream what they consider an appropriate package name for the
fonts.
- Fabian
Reply to: