[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#704238: Bug#711192: Bug#704238: Need to document the CUPS client's new server-version option



On Thu 06 Jun 2013 at 08:59:19 +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:

Several minor points:

> +<P>The default IPP version is 2.0 but can be overriden by adding a slash followed by <CODE>/version=</CODE> and the desired IPP version (can be 1.0 or 1.1).</P>

Is '. . by adding a slash followed . . . ' needed if <CODE></CODE>
contains '/version='?

> +  From Cups 1.6, the default IPP version for requests is now 2.0. For
> +  remote connections such as configured with an explicit ServerName in
> +  /etc/cups/cups-client.conf, an older IPP version such as 1.1 or even
> +  1.0 might need to be explicitely set for printing to keep working, for
> +  example:
> +
> +    ServerName remote-print-server.example.com/version=1.1
> +
> + -- Didier Raboud <odyx@debian.org>  Thu, 06 Jun 2013 08:05:57 +0200

     From cups 1.6 the default IPP version for requests is 2.0. For
     remote connections configured with ServerName in
     /etc/cups/cups-client.conf, an older IPP version such as 1.1 or even
     1.0 might need to be explicitly set for printing to keep working. For
     example:

1. 'cups' or 'CUPS', surely?

2. A comma isn't needed after '1.6'.

3. I'd remove what may be seen as some redundant words and phrases.

4. 'explicitely' should be 'explicitly'.

5. A full stop or semi-colon is better after 'working'.

Regards,

Brian.


Reply to: