Bug#711064: marked as done (Maintainer blocker bug to avoid too early Jessie migration)
Your message dated Wed, 5 Jun 2013 08:05:35 +0200
with message-id <201306050805.36003.odyx@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#711064: Maintainer blocker bug to avoid too early Jessie migration
has caused the Debian Bug report #711064,
regarding Maintainer blocker bug to avoid too early Jessie migration
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
711064: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=711064
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: cups
Version: 1.6.2-8
Severity: serious
Cups 1.6 brings in quite some invasive changes (move to cups-filters and
cups-browsed, etc) so I'd prefer if it could spend more time in unstable
to be sure we catch all bugs brought in by this new upstream release.
Please consult debian-printing@lists.debian.org before closing this bug.
Cheers,
OdyX
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Le mercredi, 5 juin 2013 02.37:28, Michael Biebl a écrit :
> Just wanted to mention that some packages might pick up a tightened
> dependency on libcups2 (>= 1.6).
> E.g. gnome-settings-daemon will enable CUPS 1.6 specific code when
> configure finds a version >= 1.6. This results in a shlibs dependeny on
> libcups2 (>= 1.6.0) [1] which then blocks gnome-settings-daemon
> migrating to testing.
>
> Hopefully you don't keep this bug open for too long.
> E.g. gnome-settings-daemon 3.4.2+git20121218.7c1322-5 fixed an RC bug
> which atm can't transition to testing.
You have a good point; hereby closing this bug; let's see if other RC bugs
appear. :)
Cheers,
OdyX
--- End Message ---
Reply to: