Your message dated Tue, 4 Jun 2013 17:57:23 +0100 with message-id <20130604165723.GA8561@desktop> and subject line Re: Bug#586702: cups insists on lp owning /dev/lp? - lp group rw isn't good enough has caused the Debian Bug report #586702, regarding cups insists on lp owning /dev/lp? - lp group rw isn't good enough to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 586702: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=586702 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: cups insists on lp owning /dev/lp? - lp group rw isn't good enough
- From: Pigeon <pigeon@pigeonsnest.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 20:12:25 +0100
- Message-id: <20100621191225.GA7602@pigeonsnest.co.uk>
Package: cups Version: 1.3.8-1+lenny6 Trying to print to an HPLJ6 on /dev/lp1 fails if lp is not the owner of the device node, even if lp has group rw on it. (Same applies to other parallel ports.) crw-rw---- 1 root lp 6, 1 Jun 17 20:13 /dev/lp1 - Doesn't work. /var/log/cups/error_log contains: E [21/Jun/2010:15:15:19 +0100] PID 31216 (/usr/lib/cups/backend/parallel) stopped with status 1! E [21/Jun/2010:15:15:19 +0100] [Job 352] Unable to open device file "/dev/lp1": Permission denied Note "permission denied" even though lp has rw permissions on the node. chowning the node to lp:sys and restarting cups fixes it. crw-rw---- 1 lp sys 6, 1 Jun 17 20:13 /dev/lp1 - Does work. However these permissions automatically revert to the non-working setup on reboot so it is necessary either to chown it again manually every time or bodge it with a startup script. Versions of packages cups Depends on: libavahi-compat-libdnssd1 0.6.23-3lenny1 libc6 2.7-18 libcups2 1.3.8-1+lenny6 libcupsimage2 1.3.8-1+lenny6 libdbus-1-3 1.2.1-5+lenny1 libgnutls26 2.4.2-6+lenny1 libkrb53 1.6.dfsg.4~beta1-5lenny1 libldap-2.4-2 2.4.11-1 libpam0g 1.0.1-5+lenny1 libpaper1 1.1.21 libslp1 1.2.1-6.2 debconf 1.5.11etch2 xpdf-utils 3.01-9.1+etch5 perl-modules 5.10.0-19lenny2 procps 1:3.2.7-3 ghostscript 8.62.dfsg.1-3.2lenny1 lsb-base 3.2-20 cups-common 1.3.8-1+lenny6 ssl-cert 1.0.23 adduser 3.102 Versions of packages cups Recommends: cups-client 1.3.8-1+lenny6 smbclient 3.0.24-6etch10 foomatic-filters 3.0.2-20061031-1.2 avahi-utils 0.6.23-3lenny1 Versions of installed packages cups Suggests: cups-bsd 1.3.8-1+lenny6 foomatic-db-engine 3.0.2-20061031-1 foomatic-db 20061031-1 hplip 2.8.6.b-4 -- Pigeon Be kind to pigeons - - Pigeon's Nest: http://pigeonsnest.co.uk/ GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x21C61F7FAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 586702-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#586702: cups insists on lp owning /dev/lp? - lp group rw isn't good enough
- From: Brian Potkin <claremont102@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 17:57:23 +0100
- Message-id: <20130604165723.GA8561@desktop>
- In-reply-to: <20100621191225.GA7602@pigeonsnest.co.uk>
- References: <20100621191225.GA7602@pigeonsnest.co.uk>
Dear Debian User, This bug report was submitted against a version of CUPS that is no longer supported in Debian. Use of our limited, volunteer supported resources is best served by not keeping around old, hardware-specific and inactive bugs for longer than desirable, so the report is now being closed. Sorry for being unable not to address the issue before now. You may, of course, wish to review the reported problem. It would be appreciated if any future investigation could be conducted using the testing or unstable distributions, preferably the latter. If considered necessary, a new bug report, possibly referencing this one, would be submitted. Please note there are now separate cups and cups-filters packages. Thank you for your report. Regards, Brian.
--- End Message ---