[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#666877: marked as done (cups broke after a dist upgrade)



Your message dated Thu, 28 Mar 2013 17:55:59 +0000
with message-id <20130328175559.GA7814@desktop>
and subject line Re: Bug#666877: it is working with older cups
has caused the Debian Bug report #666877,
regarding cups broke after a dist upgrade
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
666877: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=666877
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: cups
Severity: grave
version: 1.5.2-9

It used to work before a dist-upgrade last friday. Now I get the
following error message.


	Status: Unable to add document to print job.

And after sometime it says print succeeded but there no print out on
the printer.

I can print from cups web interface of the printer and others are able
to print on the same printer.

Thanks
Praveen
-- 
പ്രവീണ്‍ അരിമ്പ്രത്തൊടിയില്‍
You have to keep reminding your government that you don't get your
rights from them; you give them permission to rule, only so long as
they follow the rules: laws and constitution.



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu 28 Mar 2013 at 19:22:48 +0530, Praveen A wrote:

> 2013/3/28 Brian Potkin <claremont102@gmail.com>:
> > Are you still on 1.5.2-5 or have you progessed to the packages in
> > testing or unstable? If so, how are you going on with printing?
> 
> I'm on 1.5.3-5 now and printing is working fine now.

Good. That is what we like hear!

Thank you for responding so promptly. Closing.

Cheers,

Brian.

--- End Message ---

Reply to: