Bug#483086: Could we do something about this bug? was gs-common should be in oldlibs

To: 483086@bugs.debian.org, Debian Printing Team <debian-printing@lists.debian.org>, Till Kamppeter <till.kamppeter@gmail.com>, Didier Raboud <odyx@debian.org>
Subject: Bug#483086: Could we do something about this bug? was gs-common should be in oldlibs
From: Bastien ROUCARIES <roucaries.bastien@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 15:31:24 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] CAE2SPAZfkDYpzEse5zaRoiMnLPjWCvkxROfmt_ToszyyfXDbmQ@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: Bastien ROUCARIES <roucaries.bastien@gmail.com>, 483086@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] CAE2SPAafmWmPSV37P4RTWSMf=vTUy1669CPYcNeHJ4NjokJxrQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] CAE2SPAafmWmPSV37P4RTWSMf=vTUy1669CPYcNeHJ4NjokJxrQ@mail.gmail.com>

Any idea ?

Le 3 août 2012 10:33, "Bastien ROUCARIES" <roucaries.bastien@gmail.com> a écrit :

hi,

Could we do something about this bug asking to gs-common to be in oldlibs ?

Thank you.

Bastien

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#483086: Could we do something about this bug? was gs-common should be in oldlibs
  - From: Bastien ROUCARIES <roucaries.bastien@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Bug#582846: Forward this bug upstream ghostscript coredump
Next by Date: Bug#605589: Download of plug-in fails -- also with Laserjet Pro CP1525n (probably patch available)
Previous by thread: Bug#483086: Could we do something about this bug? was gs-common should be in oldlibs
Next by thread: Re: cups: filter gs takes several minutes consuming 100 % of CPU
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread