[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#404017: marked as done ("New driver: Glassjet")

Your message dated Sun, 1 Apr 2012 14:10:32 -0500
with message-id <20120401191032.GA20883@burratino>
and subject line Re: new driver for ghostscript
has caused the Debian Bug report #404017,
regarding "New driver: Glassjet"
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
404017: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=404017
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: gs-gpl
Version: 8.54.dfsg.1-5

hi gs-gpl team,

this a not a bug report, it's a patch to have a new output-driver.

i've written a new driver for a mashine we are using in our company, called
"glassjet", is uses a special type of uncompressed tiff files. the
output-driver is very simple.

http://www.its-eng.com/printers_glassjet.asp
here you can see some informations about the mashine if you wanna know about
it.

i want to make it free available for everybody.
do you know to who i should send it that it will be added in the next
version?
(please make some cleanup)

i've tested it and it works well.


regards,
johannes

Attachment: patch_gs-gpl_glassjet
Description: Binary data


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi Johannes,

Johannes Feigl wrote, five years ago:
> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:

>> First, let me congratulate you and your company for releasing the driver as
>> free software!
[...]
>> You can send it to Ghostscript upstream through
>> http://bugs.ghostscript.com/, file it as an enhancement request.
[...]
> ok, i did, we'll what happens ;)

Did you get a bug number?  Did the Ghostscript developers respond?

I'm closing this bug because I can't see how to move forward on it
without either a pointer to the driver or specs for the protocol the
glassjet uses.  We would be happy to revisit it if there is an
interested user working on this, though.

Thanks,
Jonathan

--- End Message ---
Reply to: