Bug#657047: Is this FTBFS reproducible on hplip/3.12.2-1?

To: Ronny Standtke <ronny.standtke@fhnw.ch>, Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org>
Cc: 657047@bugs.debian.org, control@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#657047: Is this FTBFS reproducible on hplip/3.12.2-1?
From: Nicolas Dandrimont <nicolas.dandrimont@crans.org>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 17:31:19 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 874nuom7c8.fsf@poincare.home.olasd.eu>
Reply-to: Nicolas Dandrimont <nicolas.dandrimont@crans.org>, 657047@bugs.debian.org

Hi,

I came across this bug during the Paris BSP, and I could reproduce it in
hplip/3.11.12-2. In the meantime, the maintainer made an upload of a new
upstream release (hplip/3.12.2-1), and I can't reproduce the failure
anymore.

Would you care to check if you can reproduce the build failure?

Thanks,
-- 
Nicolas Dandrimont

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#657047: Is this FTBFS reproducible on hplip/3.12.2-1?
  - From: Ronny Standtke <ronny.standtke@fhnw.ch>

Prev by Date: Bug#594823: [libsane-hpaio] Document that users need to be under group lp
Next by Date: Bug#623626: marked as done (hplip: complains that networked Officejet 4500 is not connected)
Previous by thread: Bug#594823: [libsane-hpaio] Document that users need to be under group lp
Next by thread: Bug#657047: Is this FTBFS reproducible on hplip/3.12.2-1?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread